The Reel Thing 2 – Sweet Young Cherry
The Reel Thing 2 – Sweet Young Cherry.
Copyright @ Cinema Classics, USA 1973. Hal Guthu Studios, by Ed Wood.
Featuring Jane Tsentas and Ric Lutz, Twosome sex (1 girl – 1 guy). The hardcore scenes are body double, not Jane.
Blonde, Couch sex, Bedroom sex, Hairy pussy, Blowjob, Pussy licking, Straight sex.
* “The end” title screen related to: Gemini film.
* First posted as: Moon Films Unknown number / title.
2 Sweet Young Cherry. She’s beautiful… she’s built like the old brick house … and she’s got the most fantastic set of breasts that makes a guy drool just looking at them. But the guys in this film get much more than just a view.
And those legs… they just ooze sex thoughts and when they lock around her lovers they know they are being sent into seventh heaven.
She has also been told that she has the most educated lips and tongue in the world. Put this reel on your projector and see for yourself. . . . The turn on is tremendous.
Size: 116Mb
Type: mp4
Duration: 00:08:03
Resolution: 768 x 576
Size: 33Mb
Type: mp4
Duration: 00:09:23
Resolution: 960 x 720
Size: 198Mb
Type: mp4
Duration: 00:09:15
Resolution: 768 x 576
The Reel Thing #2 Sweet Young Cherry
There are two films with this name.. she’s in both.. this one is distinct due to the black and white zig-zag table and the sarcophagus. Both are Hal Guthu studio productions and possibly shot by Ed Wood on the same day..
ID updated, thanks
Jane Tsentas + Ric Lutz (hardcore inserts are body-double, not Jane)
I can’t see any evidence that a body double was used in the filming of this loop & therefore I believe that it is Jane Tsentas herself performing entire scene. Which actually makes perfect sense, as the loops filmed during this period were made on the cheap, quite often with the help of mob money & weren’t expected to make much profit anyway.
Therefore there was no incentive whatsoever for the makers of them to pay a “no name” actress, like Jane Tsentas to “pretend” to have sex & then hire another actress & have to pay her to actually do the hardcore part!
The cheapist & easiest option for the makers would have been to just hire the girl who was prepared to do the whole thing & not hire Jane. While Jane was definitely good looking with sex appeal, there were dozens of other porn actresses at the time with the same attributes.
FWIW, if it was “Linda” or possibly even “Marilyn” performing in this loop rather than “no name Jane”, then I could be convinced that the producers would be prepared to draft in a body double to perform the hardcore if either of them weren’t inclined to do it, because those two were internationally famous at the time & in the case of Linda, still is more than 50 years later & therefore the loop could be expected to be in demand & to make a handsome profit for the makers & therefore more than justify the hiring of a body double.
What you say is totally correct, it is more expensive to hire body doubles and Jane Tsentas wasn’t that much of a celebrity to justify them but I too think body doubles were used. There are no penetration shots where Jane Tsentas could be seen, in the shots where they are both seen their hips barely separate and the rest consist of closeups. To this date all her filmography is softcore, simulated or lezonly. In Angie Baby though she seems to be doing cocaine.
Did re-watched this a few times,
I lean more into they used a body double for this. The model that does the hardcore scenes has a sizable pimple close to her vagina, while Jane doesn’t.
I uploaded some shots above, I can’t see the pimple on Jane (could be due to Jane’s shots are much far away shots, while the hardcore scenes are close-ups).